This is a wait-and-see item, but initial descriptions don't sound promising. Yahoo! is
reportedly
developing a music-search service that CNET claims will find audio content "from across the Internet." That—if it
corresponded to Yahoo! Video is substance and style—would be quite excellent. But a more detailed description of the
service, again from CNET, says: "The specialty engine will let people search on an artist's name, for example, and
retrieve all the available songs from other music services, as well as album reviews and band information from Yahoo
Music." Not so excellent. How would this not be a warmed-over MP3.com (which, by the way, is owned and operated by
CNET), which has become an irrelevant piece of digital music real estate. Yahoo! will probably hook the search service
into Yahoo!-owned MusicMatch content, but here's the key: If a music service doesn't actually contain music, it won't
have much meaning. A search service that points to other music services, each of which has its own search engine, adds
nothing more than metasearch value, which isn't much.
Here's a question: If Yahoo! is willing to court the wrath of video content owners over copyright infringement issues
in Yahoo! Video (it's amazing what you can find in there), will it be willing to
face down the RIAA by providing a similar music-search engine that actually digs up content?
Wait and see, wait and see.








1. "Yahoo! is reportedly developing a music-search service that CNET claims will find audio content “from across the Internet.” That—if it corresponded to Yahoo! Video is substance and style—would be quite excellent."
When I put together a simple comparative test of the video search engines, I didn't find the results at all excellent. If the music SE is as limited as the video SE, it'll be very poor indeed.
Try the Britney Spears test:
http://www.broadbandstars.co.uk/video_search_engines/index.html
See any of Britney's actual music videos?
Posted at 5:45AM on Dec 19th 2005 by Colin Donald